.jpg)
What may characterize the modern era, one that has begun to dig a trench with the times that have become increasingly explicit in the past and different, was the progressive purification of the company irrationality: "The witches have ceased to exist when we stopped burning" Voltaire says, as we all know. But the mental condition of the "real witches" has not entirely abandoned. What the Enlightenment is a process just mentioned, so that gave outstanding results in scientific progress trusting or giving life to the French Revolution, but did not explode and is constantly under threat: did not finish pay off, most really do not know where to take us, not yet reached all, and is continually threatened because those who do not enjoy the lights are a threat to the lights themselves.
experience Emancipation man himself is therefore a process that is still open and long. The contributions to this process of emancipation and enlightenment, there are countless participates with great generosity. What is meant by the philosophes, it is the actual description of a free man. Citing Immanuel Kant, the famous definition of enlightenment, we have the exact description of the Enlightenment, the philosophe and the free man. Carryover:
experience Emancipation man himself is therefore a process that is still open and long. The contributions to this process of emancipation and enlightenment, there are countless participates with great generosity. What is meant by the philosophes, it is the actual description of a free man. Citing Immanuel Kant, the famous definition of enlightenment, we have the exact description of the Enlightenment, the philosophe and the free man. Carryover:
"Enlightenment is the exit dell'uomo dallo stato di minorità che egli deve imputare a se stesso. Minorità è l'incapacità di servirsi del proprio intelletto senza la guida di un altro. Imputabile a se stesso è questa minorità, se la causa di essa non dipende da difetto di intelligenza, ma dalla mancanza di decisione e del coraggio di far uso del proprio intelletto senza essere guidato da un altro. Sapere aude! Abbi il coraggio di servirti della tua propria intelligenza! È questo il motto dell'Illuminismo"
Quale migliore focalizzazione del problema del progresso umano abbiamo a disposizione?
Questa idea dell'uomo era portata avanti da una manciata di individui che si indaffaravano nella circolazione delle idee. La necessità di una “intelligenza” presente e attiva, continuamente a lavoro è oggettiva ancora oggi, e parliamo di una importanza vitale per il futuro stesso della modernità, cioè per tenere in vita e portare avanti il progresso umano e quindi scientifico, culturale, artistico, tecnico e via dicendo, è indispensabile un'alimentazione continua. Il ruolo dell'intelligenza deve essere quello della continua ricerca e della continua discussione, cercando di diffondere il più possibile le idee sempre nuove e di coinvolgere più uomini e donne possibile.
L'intelligenza è diversa dalle stereotipate classi degli “artisti” o “intellettuali”, blessed by a culture and sensitivity in their unusual radiance, because these classes are enclosed in stagnant rooms and not contributing and do not establish authentic relationships with the company, except for rare cases.
When we talk about intelligence scholars, but not limited to, any talk of men, constantly engaged in the research of evolution, just as happened during the industrial revolution, when the men caught illiteracy bore ideas for the advancement of technology.
We may be led to think that today more than ever that human progress is possible, in fact, never before has this process is under threat: education, communications, technology, facilities and transport receptors not only new knowledge, new opportunities but also new ignorance, new obscurantism, for the most simple stupidity: the information for no reason, this is a new condition today are created those monsters born from the "sleep of reason "creatures that are much more complex than before, without education, but at the same time of unreason.
Reread the first draft of 26 August 1789 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Citizen "by the solemn and uplifting feeling of human achievement, universal. It is a text that should be chanted every morning before I wash my face and in the evening just before bedtime, as well as the establishment of the Italian Republic, considered among the most advanced and certainly it is a great work not only political, but humanistic.
Questa idea dell'uomo era portata avanti da una manciata di individui che si indaffaravano nella circolazione delle idee. La necessità di una “intelligenza” presente e attiva, continuamente a lavoro è oggettiva ancora oggi, e parliamo di una importanza vitale per il futuro stesso della modernità, cioè per tenere in vita e portare avanti il progresso umano e quindi scientifico, culturale, artistico, tecnico e via dicendo, è indispensabile un'alimentazione continua. Il ruolo dell'intelligenza deve essere quello della continua ricerca e della continua discussione, cercando di diffondere il più possibile le idee sempre nuove e di coinvolgere più uomini e donne possibile.
L'intelligenza è diversa dalle stereotipate classi degli “artisti” o “intellettuali”, blessed by a culture and sensitivity in their unusual radiance, because these classes are enclosed in stagnant rooms and not contributing and do not establish authentic relationships with the company, except for rare cases.
When we talk about intelligence scholars, but not limited to, any talk of men, constantly engaged in the research of evolution, just as happened during the industrial revolution, when the men caught illiteracy bore ideas for the advancement of technology.
We may be led to think that today more than ever that human progress is possible, in fact, never before has this process is under threat: education, communications, technology, facilities and transport receptors not only new knowledge, new opportunities but also new ignorance, new obscurantism, for the most simple stupidity: the information for no reason, this is a new condition today are created those monsters born from the "sleep of reason "creatures that are much more complex than before, without education, but at the same time of unreason.
Reread the first draft of 26 August 1789 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Citizen "by the solemn and uplifting feeling of human achievement, universal. It is a text that should be chanted every morning before I wash my face and in the evening just before bedtime, as well as the establishment of the Italian Republic, considered among the most advanced and certainly it is a great work not only political, but humanistic.
"All men, without exception, are born free, live free and enjoy the same rights. Social distinctions can only be based on the common. These rights are liberty, property, wealth, and resistance to oppression. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. Political freedom is being able to do anything that does not harm others. Anything that is not prohibited by law can not be prevented. The law is an expression of general will, as equal citizens in front of it are equally eligible to all dignities, offices, and government jobs. No man can be accused, arrested, or held in captivity except in cases specified by law. Every man is presumed innocent until found guilty. No one shall be molested for his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb public order. The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the most precious rights of man. Every citizen may therefore speak, write and publish freely, except to the abuse of this liberty in cases determined by law. Guarantee the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force, this force is therefore established for the benefit of all. The property is an inviolable and sacred right, no one can be deprived thereof except in the event of a legally established public necessity, and always with the condition of a just and prior compensation. "
The statements in the" Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Citizen "(even if that statement was not entirely disinterested), beyond the personal political beliefs (in the context of the French Revolution created the right, left and center and are then named according to the place they occupy in the national assembly) legitimize the existence of each of us, if we think that then existed anywhere before the nobility, clergy, and "the rest", completely subjugated class would belong to which most of us. The fact that the party has become aware of its flattened condition and its role came from its right. The French Revolution is therefore a human revolution, its goals are goals Enlightenment humanists.
If it was necessary to specify these principles we can imagine what life must have been before this statement. You must reflect on many of these principles were violated in the years after that declaration, in particular during the twentieth century, and reflect on how these principles are currently applied or not applied only in part. So the process of human emancipation is fully open.
The return to prominence of religion and so-called "spirituality" (a term bleak and unstable in its legitimacy) report to the spread of dogmas, definitions and solutions to rain from above, the common membership and I think at the expense of individual reason: on various issues, emerged and re-emerged in various ways in the news, with views that go to undermine those principles and concepts of man who had brought to the center right, and as a result of democracy and enlightenment which has spent much effort.
It is no accident that often when we speak of religion we speak of obscurantism. When it comes to religion, dogma, not talking about dictatorship, the dictatorship is the power of one or more men forcefully imposed on others. God (if any) is not a man, then the imposition of his alleged intention is to force things intellectual, conceptual. We are therefore beyond the dictatorship.
The media, as mentioned above, offer new vehicles obscurantism, I would say in a new blunt science. There is indeed a curious phenomenon: it is spreading with transmissions, or real documentaries, a culture that pushes to create confusion, with unsubstantiated theories and no method or unproven: the exact opposite of science. These theories blatantly exaggerated, fanciful, in which snakes such as the obsession of the conspiracy. Television programs which makes a clear distinction between mainstream science and a science officer, working discourses which tend to cast a shadow on the historical, as if to hide something. Documentaries, however, many will circulate on the Internet, and are very Clicks. Often start with intent welcomed, but they lead us in trips between fabricated information (check for yourself) and reconstruction techniques absolutely dishonest: to compare different eras, peoples different cultures in different historical moments, not that there are possible contacts (such as the Mayans and the Romans). The result can be already found in the comments to these videos on YouTube. If history bores us, we should not change history. History is not a Hollywood movie.
Many problems stem from the meeting of the research, science and culture, including art, with the trade. This has, unfortunately, eliminated much of the spontaneity of discovery and research, with devastating results. Many processes
last flowers in their splendor: the policy made with the media, the policy operated by the reversal of reality through the media, the attempt to rewrite of history by politics, resizing, even conceptually, of the inalienable rights of man.
The birth of democracy and the development of the individual and his rights is a result of that history has given birth naturally, something that had to happen because the man is still growing thanks to its individual and collective nature of being reasonable.
If it was necessary to specify these principles we can imagine what life must have been before this statement. You must reflect on many of these principles were violated in the years after that declaration, in particular during the twentieth century, and reflect on how these principles are currently applied or not applied only in part. So the process of human emancipation is fully open.
The return to prominence of religion and so-called "spirituality" (a term bleak and unstable in its legitimacy) report to the spread of dogmas, definitions and solutions to rain from above, the common membership and I think at the expense of individual reason: on various issues, emerged and re-emerged in various ways in the news, with views that go to undermine those principles and concepts of man who had brought to the center right, and as a result of democracy and enlightenment which has spent much effort.
It is no accident that often when we speak of religion we speak of obscurantism. When it comes to religion, dogma, not talking about dictatorship, the dictatorship is the power of one or more men forcefully imposed on others. God (if any) is not a man, then the imposition of his alleged intention is to force things intellectual, conceptual. We are therefore beyond the dictatorship.
The media, as mentioned above, offer new vehicles obscurantism, I would say in a new blunt science. There is indeed a curious phenomenon: it is spreading with transmissions, or real documentaries, a culture that pushes to create confusion, with unsubstantiated theories and no method or unproven: the exact opposite of science. These theories blatantly exaggerated, fanciful, in which snakes such as the obsession of the conspiracy. Television programs which makes a clear distinction between mainstream science and a science officer, working discourses which tend to cast a shadow on the historical, as if to hide something. Documentaries, however, many will circulate on the Internet, and are very Clicks. Often start with intent welcomed, but they lead us in trips between fabricated information (check for yourself) and reconstruction techniques absolutely dishonest: to compare different eras, peoples different cultures in different historical moments, not that there are possible contacts (such as the Mayans and the Romans). The result can be already found in the comments to these videos on YouTube. If history bores us, we should not change history. History is not a Hollywood movie.
Many problems stem from the meeting of the research, science and culture, including art, with the trade. This has, unfortunately, eliminated much of the spontaneity of discovery and research, with devastating results. Many processes
last flowers in their splendor: the policy made with the media, the policy operated by the reversal of reality through the media, the attempt to rewrite of history by politics, resizing, even conceptually, of the inalienable rights of man.
The birth of democracy and the development of the individual and his rights is a result of that history has given birth naturally, something that had to happen because the man is still growing thanks to its individual and collective nature of being reasonable.
Now, we look at the definition of Kant.
